Dieser Artikel unserer neuen feministische studien Bloggerin Claire Potter erschien ursprünglich am Juni auf outhistory. This article by the latest feministische studien blogger Claire Potter originally appeared on June 28th at outhistory. I am not sure that the recent decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is a victory for love, which is often such a fickle emotion. Nor am I sure that it is a victory for respectability, or the children who need far more than respectability to thrive. But I am sure that it is a victory for equal rights, and that it offers an opportunity for our queer political community to move on other social justice issues. Marriage was never the be all and end all of perfect equality, as mainstream media and LGBTQ advocacy organizations would have it. However it was a clear sign of unequal citizenship, and a suppression of our right to have the families we want to have in the ways we want to have them. Or, I will add, to not have them if we so choose, and say why. LGBTQ academics who are vigorously anti-marriage might want to Arguments For Gay Marraige on this one as they take to Facebook to predict the End of Days: when it is actually a choice not to marry — to be plurally committed, to be polyamorous, to be domestically organized outside monogamous legal bounds — how much more powerful is that as a statement of your sexual politics? They were cynical campaigns of terror against all LGBT people, and they were a form of voter fraud that sapped the energy of progressive organizers and required extensive disinformation. In response to this propaganda, activists dug in, and so did historians, writing a range of wonderful books that exposed official homophobia for what it is: unequal citizenship and an offense to the Constitution. Thus, the decision in Obergefell is not only a victory for the lawyers, it is a victory of good history over bad history. Trigger warning, if you find sweeping scholarly generalizations traumatic: you will also see bad history and selective history on both sides of the case, a continual frustration for me even when I read SCOTUS decisions that I like. The histories of gender, sexuality and feminism are far more complicated than those Obergefell has employed, something we need to keep in mind as we celebrate this milestone. Marriage is right for some people and not for others, but the past demonstrates that it is far from a uniquely perfect way for people to organize their lives. All sorts of people, across time and space, Arguments For Gay Marraige been differently married, happily unmarried, or have privileged different forms of social organization over monogamous marriage. Some people function within systems in which arranged marriage, not romance, dominate the process of creating a family. The unmarried or plurally married have often viewed many still do these domestic arrangements as crucial to their personal dignity a keyword of Obergefell and to their right to free expression. Well educated conservatives can do better than that. Are LGBT folk likely to do better at marriage than straight people? Has love won the day? Probably not: love is one of the more changeable emotions, a marriage destroyer as well as a marriage creator. Will children in LGBT families feel more secure? Some will, perhaps, but they would be wise to keep a suitcase packed all the same just in case. Anyone who studies the history of childhood, or who has ever seen a joint custody agreement play out in real time, knows that co-parenting after a divorce, even when custody is not contested, is an economic and emotional challenge. For decades, achieving gay rights has been a process of accepting half-measures, concessions and small victories while I prepare to be kicked in the face every time a SCOTUS decision or a hateful anti-marriage ballot measure is pending. Structural inequalities need to be rectified wherever we identify them, and full citizenship rights are not to be sneezed at. Critics who are angry at the amount of queer funding that Obergefell consumed have a point. To presume that crucial and underdressed issues — homelessness, poverty, health care, and the plight of queer youth — could be rectified as full citizenship rights for LGBTQ people as a whole were being retracted strikes me as fundamentally misguided, impractical and wrong. Getting the government out of the business of official homophobia is another important outcome of Obergefell : a new half-hour documentary, Uniquely Nasty: the U. By journalist Michael Issikoff and produced by Yahoo Viewfinder, it is available free on line. It will be particularly interesting if you are a political historian: the film begins with George W. Bush committing to gays in his party and then throwing them under the bus by using bans on same-sex marriage as a cynical get out the vote strategy. Finally, the Interactive Timeline we prepared on Marriage and Marriage Resisters in LGBTQ history is immediately relevant to debates between those who uncritically applaud the opening of marriage to all, those who have Arguments For Gay Marraige opposed gay marriage, and everyone in between. This exhibit also includes the amicus briefs filed by the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians on behalf of marriage equality. Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Meinen Namen, meine E-Mail-Adresse und meine Website in diesem Browser für die nächste Kommentierung speichern. Benachrichtige mich über nachfolgende Kommentare via E-Mail. Benachrichtige mich über neue Beiträge via E-Mail. Gib deine E-Mail-Adresse an, um diesen Blog zu abonnieren und Benachrichtigungen über neue Beiträge via E-Mail zu erhalten.
GAY MARRIAGE
The Gay Marriage Generation Although. Another argument against gay marriage holds that procreation is one of the pur- poses of marriage and that this purpose could not be reached by gay. Same-sex marriage is not the only civil rights issue impacting the gay community. Marriage Equality, Workplace Inequality: The Next Gay Rights Battle. Gay Marriage, in (Out)Historical Context | feministische studienAnna-Lena Scholz Pink Kafka Anne Fleig Die Stimme der Autorin Elfriede Jelinek zum Same-Sex Marriage Data. He is currently writing a book on the rise and decline of sodomy law in America. The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture , New York, USA: New York University Press, A More Accepting Society: How Legalizing Same Sex Marriages Benefits Everyone Dokument 7 Seiten. Description Staff View Description Item Description: "A Vintage original.
Copyright:
Has love won. Although. Another argument against gay marriage holds that procreation is one of the pur- poses of marriage and that this purpose could not be reached by gay. Marriage Equality, Workplace Inequality: The Next Gay Rights Battle. Same-sex marriage is not the only civil rights issue impacting the gay community. Are LGBT folk likely to do better at marriage than straight people? B gay marriage · B Gay couples Legal status, laws, etc · Description · Staff Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage by: Anderson, Erik A. Published: (). No, but that isn't what the Constitution requires of anybody.Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste. Same-Sex Marriage: Jump To Navigationjump To Search Dokument 8 Seiten. Ein Glückwunsch zum They were cynical campaigns of terror against all LGBT people, and they were a form of voter fraud that sapped the energy of progressive organizers and required extensive disinformation. GAY MARRIAGE By: Tina Chen g. Dimayacyac Dokument 6 Seiten. It will be particularly interesting if you are a political historian: the film begins with George W. Short Essay Philosophy - MORALITY, RELIGION, AND GAY MARRIAGE Dokument 7 Seiten. The Imagination and Attribution of Homosexuality Erfordert eine Authentifizierung Nicht lizenziert Lizenziert PDF downloaden 6. Appendix Studying Public Opinion with Qualitative Interview Methods Erfordert eine Authentifizierung Nicht lizenziert Lizenziert PDF downloaden. Excerpt From "Speak Now" by Kenji Yoshino. Free To Marry: Christian Hamlin Alma Garcia Dokument 7 Seiten. Title: LGBT, Getting To Know More of Them, Their Rights and What They Fight For. Dokumente Sozialwissenschaften. A Human Right and A Civil Right As Well As A Political, Social, and Religious Issue. Gabriel Agbo. LGBTQ Resource Guide Dokument 7 Seiten. Marriage is sacred, it is not to be taken lightly. LGBT Rights Dokument 13 Seiten. What The LGBT? Meta Anmelden Feed der Einträge Kommentare-Feed WordPress. Banning Same-Sex Marriage Is A Violation of Civil Rights. Written Text - G15 LDV Dokument 2 Seiten. LGBTQ academics who are vigorously anti-marriage might want to chew on this one as they take to Facebook to predict the End of Days: when it is actually a choice not to marry — to be plurally committed, to be polyamorous, to be domestically organized outside monogamous legal bounds — how much more powerful is that as a statement of your sexual politics? Marriage was never the be all and end all of perfect equality, as mainstream media and LGBTQ advocacy organizations would have it. Homosexuality vs. KI-verbesserte Titel und Beschreibungen. Professor, Harvard Law School "Spedale and Eskridge illuminate with remarkable even-handedness a debate that tends to generate more heat than light. Or, I will add, to not have them if we so choose, and say why. The state should have no say on how consenting adults conduct their lives. RIVERA, Armina Nicole C. Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen Gay Marriage: for Better Or for Worse? Originaltitel counter claim article. Contents Öffentlich zugänglich PDF downloaden. Informative Speech: By: Kerby R. READING AND WRITING Fourth Quarter RIVERA, Armina Nicole C.
